Ohgeez Directory

30 Day Money Back Guarantee

contact us

A Right to Bear Arms
Gun Control 1 Shirt shirt
Gun Control 1 Shirt
Gun Control 2 Shirt shirt
Gun Control 2 Shirt
Support Gun Control Hat hat
Support Gun Control
Gun Control Mug mug
Gun Control Mug
Gun Control Poster print
Gun Control Poster
Gun Control 1 Shirt shirt
Gun Control 1
Funny Gun Control Mouse Pad #2 mousepad
Funny Gun Control
Mouse Pad #2
Funny Gun Control Mouse Pad #1 mousepad
Funny Gun Control
Mouse Pad #1
Funny Gun Control Bumper Stickers bumpersticker
Funny Gun Control
Bumper Stickers
Funny Gun Control Magnet #2 magnet
Funny Gun Control
Magnet #2

(A) The number of physicians in the U.S. is 700,000.
(B) Accidental deaths caused by Physicians per year are 120,000.
(C) Accidental deaths per physician is 0.171.

(Statistics courtesy of U.S. Dept. of Health Human Services)

(A) The number of gun owners in the U.S. is 80,000,000.
Yes, that is 80 million.

(B) The number of accidental gun deaths per year, all age groups, is 1,500.
(C) The number of accidental deaths per gun owner is 0.000188.

Statistically, doctors are approximately 9,000 times more dangerous than gun owners.
Remember, "Guns don't kill people, doctors do."


Please alert your friends to this alarming threat. We must ban doctors before this gets completely out of hand!

Out of concern for the public at large, I have withheld the statistics on lawyers for fear the shock would cause people to panic and seek medical attention.

 Is America headed down this Alley?
You're sound asleep when you hear a thump outside your bedroom door. Half-awake, and nearly paralyzed with fear, you hear muffled whispers. At least two people have broken into your house and are moving your way. With your heart pumping, you reach down beside your bed and pick up your shotgun.. You rack a shell into the chamber, then inch toward the door and open it. In the darkness, you make out two shadows.
One holds something that looks like a crowbar. When the intruder brandishes it as if to strike, you raise the
shotgun and fire. The blast knocks both thugs to the floor. One writhes and screams while the second man crawls to the front door and lurches outside. As you pick up the telephone to call police, you know you're in trouble. In your country, most guns were outlawed years before, and the few That are privately owned are so stringently regulated as to make them useless. Yours was never registered. Police arrive and inform you that the second burglar has died. They arrest you for First Degree Murder and Illegal Possession of a Firearm. When you talk to your attorney, he tells you not to worry: authorities will probably plea the case down to manslaughter.
"What kind of sentence will I get?" you ask.

"Only ten-to-twelve years," he replies, as if
that's nothing. "Behave yourself, and you'll be
out in seven." The next day, the shooting is the lead story in the local newspaper.. Somehow, you're portrayed as an eccentric vigilante while the two men you shot are represented as choirboys. Their friends and relatives can't find an unkind word to say about them. Buried deep down in the article, authorities acknowledge that both
"victims" have been arrested numerous times. But
the next day's headline says it all: "Lovable Rogue
Son Didn't Deserve to Die." The thieves have been
transformed from career criminals into Robin Hood-type
pranksters. As the days wear on, the story takes wings. The national media picks it up, then the international media. The surviving burglar has become a folk hero.
Your attorney says the thief is preparing to sue you, and
he'll probably win. The media publishes reports that
your home has been burglarized several times in the past and that you've been critical of local police for their lack
of effort in apprehending the suspects. After the last
break-in, you told your neighbor that you would be prepared next time. The District Attorney uses this to allege that you were lying in wait for the burglars.
A few months later, you go to trial. The charges
haven't been reduced, as your lawyer had so confidently
predicted. When you take the stand, your anger at the
injustice of it all works against you. Prosecutors paint a
picture of you as a mean, vengeful man. It doesn't take
long for the jury to convict you of all charges.
The judge sentences you to life in prison.
This case really happened!

On August 22, 1999, Tony Martin of Emneth, Norfolk ,
England , killed one burglar and wounded a second. In April, 2000, he was convicted and is now serving a life term. Updated information on the case can be found here -http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/norfolk/3087003.stm

How did it become a crime to defend one's own life in
the once great British Empire ?
It started with the Pistols Act of 1903. This seemingly
reasonable law forbade selling pistols to minors or felons
and established that handgun sales were to be made only to
those who had a license. The Firearms Act of 1920 expanded licensing to include not only handguns but all firearms except shotguns.
Later laws passed in 1953 and 1967 outlawed the carrying of any weapon by private citizens and mandated the registration of all shotguns. Momentum for total handgun confiscation began in earnest
after the Hungerford mass shooting in 1987.. Michael Ryan, a mentally disturbed Man with a Kalashnikov rifle, walked down the streets shooting everyone he saw. When the smoke cleared, 17 people were dead.
The British public, already de-sensitized by eighty years
of "gun control", demanded even tougher
restrictions. (The seizure of all privately owned handguns
was the objective even though Ryan used a rifle.)

Nine years later, at Dunblane , Scotland , Thomas Hamilton used a semi-automatic weapon to murder 16 children and a teacher at a public school.
For many years, the media had portrayed all gun owners as mentally unstable or worse, criminals. Now the press had a real kook with which to beat up law-abiding gun owners. Day after day, week after week, the media gave up all pretense of objectivity and demanded a total ban on all handguns. The Dunblane Inquiry, a few months later, Sealed the fate of the few sidearm still owned by private citizens. During the years in which the British government incrementally took away most gun rights, the notion that a citizen had the right to armed self-defense came to be seen as vigilantism. Authorities refused to grant gun licenses to people who were threatened, claiming that self-defense was no longer considered a reason to own a gun. Citizens who shot burglars or robbers or rapists were charged while the real criminals were released. Indeed, after the Martin shooting, a police spokesman was quoted as saying, "We cannot have people take the law into their own hands."
All of Martin's neighbors had been robbed numerous
times, and several elderly people were severely injured in
beatings by young thugs who had no fear of the consequences. Martin himself, a collector of antiques, had seen most of his collection trashed or stolen by burglars. When the Dunblane Inquiry ended, citizens who owned handguns were given three months to turn them over to local authorities. Being good British subjects, most people obeyed the law. The few who didn't were visited by police and threatened with ten-year prison sentences if they didn't comply. Police later bragged that they'd taken nearly 200,000 handguns from private citizens. How did the authorities know who had handguns? The guns had been registered and licensed. Kinda like cars. Sound familiar?


"..It does not require a majority to prevail, but
rather an irate, tireless minority keen to set brush fires
in people's minds.."
--Samuel Adams

If you think this is important, please forward to everyone
you know. You better wake up cause your new president is
going to do this very same thing over here if he can get it
done. And there are very stupid people in congress and on the
street that will go right along with him
This story was received as an anonymous email.